Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in children: Risk assessment
Pediatric Pulmonology, 2017
I read with interest the study by Joosten et al. on the evaluation of obstructive sleep apnea syn... more I read with interest the study by Joosten et al. on the evaluation of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) in children. The authors summarized the causes of OSAS by upper airway obstruction such as adenotonsillar hypertrophy, obesity, craniofacial abnormalities, and neuromuscular disorders. The symptoms of OSAS by intermittent upper airway obstruction is recognized by parental report of snoring and/or apneic events in children, which relate to the increased daytime sleepiness, hyperactivity, poor school performance, inadequate somatic growth rate, or enuresis. Polysomnography is the gold standard method for the diagnosis of OSAS, and nocturnal oximetry and/or sleep questionnaires is useful for the screening of OSAS. I have some concerns about their report. First, Baker et al. evaluated predictors of sleep apnea severity in 224 adolescents, aged 12-17 years old, by excluding past history of tonsillectomy/adenoidectomy. Adjusted odds ratios (95%CIs) of male, tonsillar hypertrophy, and obesity for severe OSAS, defined as apnea hypopnea index (AHI) >10, were 2.3 (1.2-4.3), 3.8 (2.0-7.1), and 2.2 (1.4-3.6), respectively. In contrast, age and ethnicity did not predict severe OSAS by multivariate logistic regression analysis. In contrast, Erdim et al. investigated the association between metabolic syndrome and AHI in 104 obese adolescents, aged 11 years or older, presenting no significant association between metabolic syndrome and AHI. They did not use severe OSA as an indicator and they did not adjust confounding variables, and risk factors of OSAS in children should be evaluated with special reference to the severity of OSAS by adjusting several confounders. Second, the severity of OSAS in children is judged by the appropriate cut-off point of AHI, which is different from that in adults. In addition, the health information of OSAS in children is not enough in comparison with those in adults. Further studies are needed to confirm the health effect of OSAS in children. Finally, Kang et al. conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of lingual tonsillectomy on subsequent pediatric OSAS. Although only four studies were used for the analysis, they concluded that lingual tonsillectomy was effective for pediatric OSAS with improvement in the AHI and the minimum oxygen saturation. As a half of the patients showed postoperative AHI >5 in their meta-analysis, long-term effects should be evaluated by further studies.
Uploads
Papers by sepehr sadeghi