Liturgy and the Ecclesiastical History of Late Anglo-Saxon England: Four Studies by David N. Dumville
Catholic Historical Review, 1996
Liturgy and the Ecclesiastical History of Late Anglo-Saxon England: Four Studies. By David N. Dum... more Liturgy and the Ecclesiastical History of Late Anglo-Saxon England: Four Studies. By David N. Dumville. [Studies in Anglo-Saxon (Rochester,NewYork: The Boydell Press. 1992. Pp. x, 193. $59.00.) David N. Dumville's important collection of previously unpublished essays on matters related to the English liturgy during the tenth and eleventh centuries is dedicated to Helmut Gneuss,"on his sixty-fifth birthday in gratitude for his formidable contributions to the study of Anglo-Saxon liturgy and manuscripts." Such a tribute to Professor Gneuss is appropriate, for his work on liturgical manuscripts is central to the contemporary study of the English liturgy; equally central, however, are Dumville's own studies on the provenances and interrelationships of ninth-, tenth-, and eleventh-century manuscripts, and the collection of studies under review presupposes access, if not indeed familiarity, with Dumville's Wessex and England from Alfred to Edgar and English Caroline Script and Monastic History, volumes three and six respectively in the Studies in Anglo-Saxon History series, as well as his important essays on "English Square minuscule script" in volumes 16 and 23 of Anglo-Saxon England. The first study, "The Kalendar of the Junius Psalter," examines the neglected kalendar (fols. 2'-7) of Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS. Junius 27, the so-called "Junius Psalter." The feasts in this kalendar that were graded high are indicated by hexametrical verses which replicate the lines in a metrical martyrology, sometimes known as the "Hampson" martyrology, the earliest surviving manuscript of which is London, British Library, MS. Cotton Galba A.xviii. Dumville constructs an elaborate but plausible hypothesis which suggests Canterbury as the probable point of origin of both the metrical martyrology and the liturgical material in the Junius Psalter's kalendar, which therefore allows the attribution of MS. Junius 27 to Canterbury In "The Liturgical Kalendar of Anglo-Saxon Glastonbury: a Chimaera?" Dumville argues that the kalendar of Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS. Bodley 579, the "Leofric Missal," does not derive from a Glastonbury original, but from Canterbury His case for freeing the kalendar from Glastonbury is strong, indeed, since the Glastonbury attribution was constructed on a scholarly repetition of E E. Warren's flawed argument for such an origin when he edited the Leofric Missal in 1883; the case for attributing the kalendar to Canterbury remains, as Dumville admits, to be proven. The third article, entitled "Liturgical Books for the Anglo-Saxon Episcopate: A Reconsideration," begins with Gneuss's data concerning only those books which would have been used by a bishop or archbishop, to which Dumville adds a brief essay on relevant paleographical and codicological considerations for each book. …
Uploads
Papers by Patrick Conner