The Impact of Surgical Resectability on Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Primary Radiation Treatment for Human Papillomavirus-Related Oropharyngeal Cancer
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2022
INTRODUCTION Primary radiotherapy ± chemotherapy (RT/CRT) is the most common treatment for oropha... more INTRODUCTION Primary radiotherapy ± chemotherapy (RT/CRT) is the most common treatment for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC), but there has been an increase in transoral surgery (TOS) for T1-2 tumors. Since only a subset of T1-2 tumors are TOS-favorable, non-randomized comparisons between RT/CRT and TOS could be confounded by indication. We aimed to compare outcomes of potential TOS-candidates vs. non-TOS candidates, among patients who underwent RT/CRT for early T-stage OPSCC. METHODS For patients treated with RT/CRT for early-stage human papilloma virus (HPV) positive OPSCC between 2014 and 2018, pretreatment imaging was reviewed by three head-and-neck surgeons, blinded to outcomes, to assess primary-site appropriateness for TOS, and extracapsular extension (ECE) was scored by a head-and-neck neuroradiologist. We compared outcomes based on surgical favorability pertaining to: 1) the primary site tumor alone, and 2) the primary site and an absence of ECE. Kaplan-Meier estimates for overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared using the log-rank test, with Cox regression used for multivariable modelling. RESULTS One hundred and forty-three patients were evaluated, of which 121 were male (84.6%), the median age was 59.4 years, and all of them were p16 positive (100%). The primary site was TOS-favorable in 115/143 (80.4%). Patients with TOS-favorable primary site experienced superior 5-year OS (89.8% vs. 71.2% p=0.017), DSS (90.4% vs. 63.4% p=0.022), and RFS (83% vs. 49.4% p=0.04) compared with TOS-unfavorable patients. Similarly, patients with a TOS-favorable primary site and no ECE on imaging 101/143 (70.6%), had improved OS, DSS, and RFS (p<0.05) compared with TOS-unfavorable patients. CONCLUSION In this first study to assess surgical favorability as a prognostic factor among patients with T1/2 p16+ OPSCC, patients with TOS-favorable early-stage OPSCC have better outcomes than TOS-unfavorable patients. This provides valuable prognostic information for patients, and also suggests the risk of confounding by indication in non-randomized comparisons of treatment modalities.
Uploads
Papers by Adrian Mendez