Technical perspective: On proofs, entanglement, and games
Communications of The ACM, Oct 25, 2021
form of rigidity of quantum mechanics. It is as if the verifier gets to peek into the secret quan... more form of rigidity of quantum mechanics. It is as if the verifier gets to peek into the secret quantum labs of the provers! Moreover, a quantum version of low-degree tests enables selftests that verify exponentially long entangled states, using only polynomial communication. Now comes a mindboggling idea: though the verifier’s messages are too short to specify its exponentially long questions about the doubly exponentially long proof, it can use quantum self-testing to efficiently force the provers to share an exponentially large, entangled state and then to correctly sample their questions themselves. This result is just the start of the story; going all the way to the halting problem requires modifying the “compression-by-entanglement” idea so it can be applied recursively. A plethora of new hurdles arise, whose solution is the tour de force in this paper. The exciting applications include constructing infinite algebras that cannot be approximated in any finite dimension and separating quantum correlations models previously conjectured to be equal. Self-testing is connected to group stability, which raises hope for progress on major problems in group theory. How to explain the strong impact this theoretical computer science result has on pure mathematics? PCPs and other powerful computational complexity concepts are applied here, but perhaps another aspect is the role protocols play in the result. These sequences of individual steps that depend on time, constitute an intuitive way to think about highly complex mathematical objects, an approach that seems to offer a fresh look at physics and mathematical problems.
Uploads
Papers by Dorit Aharonov