
Rachel Palmen
Participatory arenas have been a growing feature of governance and public policy in the 'North' and 'South' as attempts are made to involve local communities in decision-making processes. These developments have been accompanied by a proliferation of research examining these community engagement processes from a variety of different persepctives. Despite the similar themes addressed in the development studies literature and urban regeneration literature in the U.K. there are few studies that compare participatory spaces in the global 'North' with those in the global 'South'. The main debates highlighted in both bodies of literature pivots around the tyranny-transformation dichotomy. Participatory processes are portrayed as either spaces facilitating the increased regulation of the population or enabling transformation in favour of a social justice which benefits poorer sections of society.
This thesis considers the tyranny-transformation dichotomy ion two empirical case studies at the neighbourhood level: a New Deal for Communities Regeneration Programme, in the North East of England; and the Participatory Budgeting Process in Porto Alegre, Brazil. The research conducted fell within a grounded theory research framework, utilising a qualitative strategy. This enabled a focus on the experiences of key players and community representatives.
Supervisors: Professor Paul Lawless
This thesis considers the tyranny-transformation dichotomy ion two empirical case studies at the neighbourhood level: a New Deal for Communities Regeneration Programme, in the North East of England; and the Participatory Budgeting Process in Porto Alegre, Brazil. The research conducted fell within a grounded theory research framework, utilising a qualitative strategy. This enabled a focus on the experiences of key players and community representatives.
Supervisors: Professor Paul Lawless
less
Uploads
Papers by Rachel Palmen